From 79bd72e062fabcd6c0b73cfba6d35178e179da41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kai Stevenson
- I was too concerned with the answer to the question of what is moral to consider that the question itself - is absurd on its face. -
-- I neglected the information transfer problem. Epiphenomenalism is unpalatable. Interactive parralelism seems - to work, as does idealism. -
-- Consciousness is necessarily immaterial. Even if all else is matter, a single counterexample is evidently enough to - invalidate a proposition. -
-- Nothing I have done thus far has been hard, even when I go about it in the most contrived way possible. - I ought not assume that any future endeavour will be prohibitively challenging. -
-- Extrapolation is circular. Mathematics is meaningless. -
-- And that it is possible to have no narratives without having a narrative of having no narratives. - See above. + Unfortunately, it turns out that I've never been wrong about anything! Just kidding, that statement + was an example of me being wrong about something.
-- cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2